![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
HOME PAGE Movie Videos Films by Year Films by Director Films by Actor Films by Actress Films by Alphabet Film Characters Film Franchises TOP 100 MOVIES in 2008! 2013 MOVIES 2012 MOVIES 2011 MOVIES 2010 MOVIES 2009 MOVIES 2008 MOVIES 2007 MOVIES 2006 MOVIES 2005 MOVIES 2004 MOVIES 2003 MOVIES 2002 MOVIES 2001 MOVIES 2000 MOVIES 1999 MOVIES 1998 MOVIES 1997 MOVIES 1996 MOVIES 1995 MOVIES 1994 MOVIES 1993 MOVIES 1992 MOVIES 1991 MOVIES 1990 MOVIES 1989 MOVIES 1988 MOVIES 1987 MOVIES 1986 MOVIES 1985 MOVIES 1984 MOVIES 1983 MOVIES 1982 MOVIES 1981 MOVIES 1980 MOVIES 1979 MOVIES 1978 MOVIES 1977 MOVIES 1976 MOVIES 1975 MOVIES 1974 MOVIES 1973 MOVIES 1972 MOVIES 1971 MOVIES 1970 MOVIES 1969 MOVIES 1968 MOVIES 1967 MOVIES 1966 MOVIES 1965 MOVIES 1964 MOVIES 1963 MOVIES 1962 MOVIES 1961 MOVIES 1960 MOVIES 1959 MOVIES 1958 MOVIES 1957 MOVIES 1956 MOVIES 1955 MOVIES 1954 MOVIES 1953 MOVIES 1952 MOVIES 1951 MOVIES 1950 MOVIES 1949 MOVIES 1948 MOVIES 1947 MOVIES 1946 MOVIES 1945 MOVIES 1944 MOVIES 1943 MOVIES 1942 MOVIES 1941 MOVIES 1940 MOVIES 1939 MOVIES 1938 MOVIES 1937 MOVIES 1936 MOVIES 1935 MOVIES 1934 MOVIES 1933 MOVIES 1932 MOVIES 1931 MOVIES 1930 MOVIES 1929 MOVIES 1928 MOVIES 1927 MOVIES 1926 MOVIES 1925 MOVIES 1924 MOVIES 1923 MOVIES 1922 MOVIES 1921 MOVIES 1920 MOVIES 1919 MOVIES 1918 MOVIES 1917 MOVIES 1916 MOVIES 1915 MOVIES 1914 MOVIES 1913 MOVIES 1912 MOVIES 1911 MOVIES 1910 MOVIES ![]() |
Armed men hijack a New York City subway train, holding the passengers hostage in return for a ransom, and turning an ordinary day's work for dispatcher Walter Garbe into a face-off with the mastermind behind the crime. WATCH NOW a spot on impression of Denzel Washington CLICK HERE and watch 2009 MOVIES FOR FREE! REVIEW:
Tony Scott is a damn fine filmmaker, and he's only getting better with age. The Taking of Pelham 123, based on the same novel as the 1974 classic, has Scott's signature music video sensibility which carries on through the opening credits to the last frame. This guy has moves and shots that no one else would think of, and still the action is clean and clear and relentlessly fascinating. The original Pelham, a very fine film, stuck close to the book and delved into the various psyches of the hijackers, including an unforgettable performance by Hector Elizondo, not to mention Walter Matthau and Robert Shaw at their powerhouse best. But short of the basic premise and some glossed-over plot devices, this new Pelham is a different beast altogether, a dialogue between two men with a lot to lose. Scott's all-seeing eye never stops revealing the minutiae of the characters, whether it's a remark that comes out unintendedly racist, or the passenger who is emasculated when he can't relieve himself with anyone watching him. He has a surprisingly light and natural touch with the abundant jokes in the film as well, and keeps the highly pumped action bearable with sly humor. At one point, he even gets a laugh by having a character point out what could be interpreted as a potential plot hole. The cast is remarkable: it's fun to hear Gandolfini without his New Jersey gravel as a kind of ineffective and out of shape Giuliani, and good to see John Turturro returning to a role that uses his capacity for gravity for something other than a comic turn. Travolta as the apparently amoral Ryder, leader of the hijackers, seems to be bookending the revival of his career in Pulp Fiction; if he never plays another role in his life, this is the one to go out on. He's demonstrates the edge he has when he's at his best, and he's seldom been better. Denzel Washington steps out of his comfort zone a little, packing on a pot belly to play a career civil worker stuck in both an ethics investigation and a deadly game with Ryder. This is also one of the first films I've yet seen to seamlessly and intelligently incorporate new media without sounding like a "Modern Technology for Dummies" tutorial. A subplot with a live streaming broadcast of the hostage situation in progress seems under-developed, but works well enough. The new Pelham is a potent cocktail of politics, bureaucracy, and raw emotion. Still, one of the things that made the first interpretation so damn good was the interplay between the much more defined personalities of the hijackers, so it remains very worthwhile to watch the original as well. And like a pair of subway trains on separate spur lines, these two diverge especially in their outcomes. 2009's ending will be easier for modern audiences to handle, while that of the '74 version had a bit more of a nihilistic take on the outcome in keeping with the times. All in all, the film is really smart and really tense, and puts together some of the strongest personalities working in film today to make up one of the best ensemble casts in decades. In a nostalgic sense, it feels like a 70s film, from the cuts and the roving camera to something about the intensity of the emotions. There's a bit of a Dog Day Afternoon sensibility, and I liked it a lot. If you're missing flicks like Mean Streets and The French Connection, you'll get some of that same feel here. The adjectives smart and stylish get thrown around a lot when it comes to action flicks; this one is the real thing. Highly recommended.
|
|||||||||||||