![]() |
||||||||||||||||
|
HOME PAGE Movie Videos Films by Year Films by Director Films by Actor Films by Actress Films by Alphabet Film Characters Film Franchises TOP 100 MOVIES in 2000! 2013 MOVIES 2012 MOVIES 2011 MOVIES 2010 MOVIES 2009 MOVIES 2008 MOVIES 2007 MOVIES 2006 MOVIES 2005 MOVIES 2004 MOVIES 2003 MOVIES 2002 MOVIES 2001 MOVIES 2000 MOVIES 1999 MOVIES 1998 MOVIES 1997 MOVIES 1996 MOVIES 1995 MOVIES 1994 MOVIES 1993 MOVIES 1992 MOVIES 1991 MOVIES 1990 MOVIES 1989 MOVIES 1988 MOVIES 1987 MOVIES 1986 MOVIES 1985 MOVIES 1984 MOVIES 1983 MOVIES 1982 MOVIES 1981 MOVIES 1980 MOVIES 1979 MOVIES 1978 MOVIES 1977 MOVIES 1976 MOVIES 1975 MOVIES 1974 MOVIES 1973 MOVIES 1972 MOVIES 1971 MOVIES 1970 MOVIES 1969 MOVIES 1968 MOVIES 1967 MOVIES 1966 MOVIES 1965 MOVIES 1964 MOVIES 1963 MOVIES 1962 MOVIES 1961 MOVIES 1960 MOVIES 1959 MOVIES 1958 MOVIES 1957 MOVIES 1956 MOVIES 1955 MOVIES 1954 MOVIES 1953 MOVIES 1952 MOVIES 1951 MOVIES 1950 MOVIES 1949 MOVIES 1948 MOVIES 1947 MOVIES 1946 MOVIES 1945 MOVIES 1944 MOVIES 1943 MOVIES 1942 MOVIES 1941 MOVIES 1940 MOVIES 1939 MOVIES 1938 MOVIES 1937 MOVIES 1936 MOVIES 1935 MOVIES 1934 MOVIES 1933 MOVIES 1932 MOVIES 1931 MOVIES 1930 MOVIES 1929 MOVIES 1928 MOVIES 1927 MOVIES 1926 MOVIES 1925 MOVIES 1924 MOVIES 1923 MOVIES 1922 MOVIES 1921 MOVIES 1920 MOVIES 1919 MOVIES 1918 MOVIES 1917 MOVIES 1916 MOVIES 1915 MOVIES 1914 MOVIES 1913 MOVIES 1912 MOVIES 1911 MOVIES 1910 MOVIES ![]() |
SYNOPSIS: Peaceful farmer Benjamin Martin is driven to lead the Colonial Militia during the American Revolution when a sadistic British officer murders his son. REVIEW: There were two reasons I wanted to revisit this otherwise panned but commercial hit of a film. #1 - I wanted to see one of Heath Ledger's earliest works and the first film he did that captured the attention of Hollywood audiences. #2 - There was a Canadian film in 2008 called Passchendaele that had a similar setup story as The Patriot and I wanted to see how they compared. In hindsight these were two completely different stories with the exception that the two leads go back to war to project and attempt to save their loved one from dying. I don't think Mel Gibson has pulled off a better performance that in The Patriot. He's really good in it. And so are the war scenes and really the entire film. IF this was a movie based purely on fiction. But The Patriot gets seen through a different set of eyes because it is based on some historical facts of how the Independent States of America in the 1700s eventually became the United States of America. A War occured and the underdogs one. The underdogs being the American Revolution, who wanted independence and peace from the British Colonies. This war was the beginning for this still really young country who has really made a name for itself in recent centuries. And has become an extreme power and influence with the rest of the world. And it all started when they stopped wanting to listen to the British. Of course this is a very gray world but Hollywood and Producer/Director Ronald Emmerich choose to tell a very black and white story about a father of seven with past regrets who becomes a very influential solder in this very important war. And as in every war, when a person wins he/she also loses a great deal as well too. It's the 1700s and most afluent white familes had blacks as slaves. But not Mel Gibson's family! Of course the blacks chose to be with his family and were free to go anytime. I guess you still need to tell a story set in the 1700s with our 2000s mentality attached. Meaning that Hollywood thought that no modern audience member could root for a main character who had slaves. Then they took it an extra mile by having a black soldier in Mel's Militia army who was free to go anytime! But of course he stayed to fight for the independance of America. But why? So he could be a slave again and his kids could be slaves too for the next 100 years? Doesn't really make sense does it? And in any War film you need an enemy. And it's always the side you start with that will be the good side. So the enemy in The Patriot is the British. And boy are they some nasty people. A General (played by Tom Wilkinson) who will kill people in cold blood no matter what rules he's breaking in order to win. And a Colonol who kills Mel's kid for no reason other that he was in his way. Or course storywise that is when the 1st act ends as Mel wakes up and seeks revenge. Mel's revenge equals good things for the Aemrican Revolution! I wonder if the United States would of existed if his kid didn't get killed by that nasty British soldier with the bad teeth?????? The world would be a different place. The Patriot is good film in many ways and bad in many more ways. It's a fun film but not the type of movie that History students should be watching. And Heath Ledger just has that spark that can't be taught in any acting class. The camera loves him and he loves it back. A fine actor who built up a nice 8 year Hollywood career before his unfortunate passing. The role he plays in The Patriot has everything an actor loves: boy becomes man, man rebels against father, man falls in love, man becomes leader, man kills another man, man saves another man's life, man gets married, man loses virginity, man fights for something bigger than man, man.....well I don't want to give the rest away as there is more. As a filmmaker, I learned a lot from watching The Patriot. As of this writing, it's early 2009 and the industry has changed a lot since this movie was being made 10 years ago. I'm sure they would of went a whole lot more CGI if they were making The Patriot now. And perhaps that's what's good about the filmmaking in this film. They didn't have the 'toys' that they have today so they had to use their creative minds a bit more. Terrific war sequences in this film. It was a horrible time and man suffered a great deal during wars as the pain must of been unbearable. And they were really able to show that to us and make us feel. But why do they have to change certain things to attempt to appeal to the masses? I've always felt that Hollywood tends to underestimate people. So what if Mel Gibson has slaves? In hindsight now with what he went through in his personal life, it would probably of worked really well.
Return from THE PATRIOT to home page |
|||||||||||||||