![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
HOME PAGE Movie Videos Films by Year Films by Director Films by Actor Films by Actress Films by Alphabet Film Characters Film Franchises TOP 100 MOVIES in 2006! 2013 MOVIES 2012 MOVIES 2011 MOVIES 2010 MOVIES 2009 MOVIES 2008 MOVIES 2007 MOVIES 2006 MOVIES 2005 MOVIES 2004 MOVIES 2003 MOVIES 2002 MOVIES 2001 MOVIES 2000 MOVIES 1999 MOVIES 1998 MOVIES 1997 MOVIES 1996 MOVIES 1995 MOVIES 1994 MOVIES 1993 MOVIES 1992 MOVIES 1991 MOVIES 1990 MOVIES 1989 MOVIES 1988 MOVIES 1987 MOVIES 1986 MOVIES 1985 MOVIES 1984 MOVIES 1983 MOVIES 1982 MOVIES 1981 MOVIES 1980 MOVIES 1979 MOVIES 1978 MOVIES 1977 MOVIES 1976 MOVIES 1975 MOVIES 1974 MOVIES 1973 MOVIES 1972 MOVIES 1971 MOVIES 1970 MOVIES 1969 MOVIES 1968 MOVIES 1967 MOVIES 1966 MOVIES 1965 MOVIES 1964 MOVIES 1963 MOVIES 1962 MOVIES 1961 MOVIES 1960 MOVIES 1959 MOVIES 1958 MOVIES 1957 MOVIES 1956 MOVIES 1955 MOVIES 1954 MOVIES 1953 MOVIES 1952 MOVIES 1951 MOVIES 1950 MOVIES 1949 MOVIES 1948 MOVIES 1947 MOVIES 1946 MOVIES 1945 MOVIES 1944 MOVIES 1943 MOVIES 1942 MOVIES 1941 MOVIES 1940 MOVIES 1939 MOVIES 1938 MOVIES 1937 MOVIES 1936 MOVIES 1935 MOVIES 1934 MOVIES 1933 MOVIES 1932 MOVIES 1931 MOVIES 1930 MOVIES 1929 MOVIES 1928 MOVIES 1927 MOVIES 1926 MOVIES 1925 MOVIES 1924 MOVIES 1923 MOVIES 1922 MOVIES 1921 MOVIES 1920 MOVIES 1919 MOVIES 1918 MOVIES 1917 MOVIES 1916 MOVIES 1915 MOVIES 1914 MOVIES 1913 MOVIES 1912 MOVIES 1911 MOVIES 1910 MOVIES ![]() |
Harold Crick leads an organized, numerical life. He counts his brushstrokes, his steps to work, and his wristwatch is always on time. But when he starts hearing a voice in his head, and it turns out to be just more than him, Harold’s life suddenly goes awry, unorganized and spontaneous. With this voice narrating his life, his feelings, and apparently his future, Harold must find a way to escape the story he thinks he is part of, or face something he could never dream of. CLICK HERE and watch 2009 MOVIES FOR FREE! REVIEW: A Will Ferrell movie seems to always consist of the same noticeable elements with each one he does. Sometimes it’s his distinctive hairstyle, graphic and violent humour, or just Ferrell being a dolt on camera. Not to say any of that is bad, though it does get him a bad rap every so often with films like Semi-Pro or Blades of Glory. Still, he is an audience’s actor, and his main purpose is to make an audience react. He does it through laughter, and he’s been doing well for almost a decade. So the main thing you expect from a film like Stranger than Fiction even before seeing it is—naturally—a Will Ferrell movie. It was quite refreshing and quite surprising that I got nothing of the sort. Instead I got a window into the versatility that Ferrell presents with this film, along with a captivating story and a feeling you get after watching it that resembles the very emotions that these characters feel on screen. Stranger than Fiction is obviously a very character-driven film. It relies on the interactions between key characters to set the tone for the rest of the film. Ironic, since in the film Harold Crick finds out that the plot of his story always ends up finding him. It is not only Ferrell’s performance that catches my eye; Maggie Gyllenhaal is written in as a stubborn and passionately angry baker, insulted at Crick’s play into government conspiracy, being an IRS agent. While Ferrell’s character is reserved, quiet and productive, Ana (Gyllenhaal) provides a more chaotic and spontaneous voice to the film, which progresses into Crick’s life in more ways than one. Plus, anyone that’s seen any other Will Ferrell film will be caught off-guard at once. This isn’t ordinary Will Ferrell. No wacky wigs, loud shouting, or graphic slapstick. No unbelievable situations (compared to this film) or stupid characters. Ferrell plays a regular man, leading a regular life, and begins to get surrounded by irregularities. It’s honest acting on Farrell’s account and it works. Once this settles in, Farrell thrives in his new, subtler environment with effectiveness, and he certainly carries the film forward with his performance. But the main factor with Stranger than Fiction is its relationship between narrator and character. It may have been done before, but it’s never been done with so much humour or relevance. With Emma Thompson being the source of this god-like voice, it is never a bore to see Harold’s reactions to her various descriptions or predictions about his life. As the film progresses, Thompson’s narration turns out to be from not a god-like source, but rather a literary one. Harold’s own quest to discover the source of this voice in his head and to get some very important answers regarding her narration is more than enough to make for an enjoyable experience. But of course, there is another person you need to make this story work. Dustin Hoffman plays Professor Jules Hilbert, the helpful mentor who provides Harold with some guidance on the nature of his narrator and story he is apparently apart of. There is the love interest, the mentor, the sidekick in Harold’s very own wristwatch, maybe even an antagonist, though it’s hard to antagonize anyone in this film since they are all likeable enough. Ana’s change of heart of Harold’s change of attitude; there’s enough symbolism in this film to pick apart into analysis, but it seems unnecessary. There’s enough of this film on the surface to make you smile, let alone below it. All the characters are enjoyable to watch, the plot is enjoyable to follow, and the whole movie is a blast to witness. It’s not a Will Ferrell film, which is great since it provides a refreshing and different feeling from his usual movies. While it doesn’t get critical acclaim, the whole cast is honest and effective and the storytelling is much more fun than it should be. It’s another one of those films that you seem to pass off after watching it once, but it never gets told once you stumble onto it again. And that is never a bad thing.
|
|||||||||||||