![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
HOME PAGE Movie Videos Films by Year Films by Director Films by Actor Films by Actress Films by Alphabet Film Characters Film Franchises TOP 100 MOVIES in 2008! 2013 MOVIES 2012 MOVIES 2011 MOVIES 2010 MOVIES 2009 MOVIES 2008 MOVIES 2007 MOVIES 2006 MOVIES 2005 MOVIES 2004 MOVIES 2003 MOVIES 2002 MOVIES 2001 MOVIES 2000 MOVIES 1999 MOVIES 1998 MOVIES 1997 MOVIES 1996 MOVIES 1995 MOVIES 1994 MOVIES 1993 MOVIES 1992 MOVIES 1991 MOVIES 1990 MOVIES 1989 MOVIES 1988 MOVIES 1987 MOVIES 1986 MOVIES 1985 MOVIES 1984 MOVIES 1983 MOVIES 1982 MOVIES 1981 MOVIES 1980 MOVIES 1979 MOVIES 1978 MOVIES 1977 MOVIES 1976 MOVIES 1975 MOVIES 1974 MOVIES 1973 MOVIES 1972 MOVIES 1971 MOVIES 1970 MOVIES 1969 MOVIES 1968 MOVIES 1967 MOVIES 1966 MOVIES 1965 MOVIES 1964 MOVIES 1963 MOVIES 1962 MOVIES 1961 MOVIES 1960 MOVIES 1959 MOVIES 1958 MOVIES 1957 MOVIES 1956 MOVIES 1955 MOVIES 1954 MOVIES 1953 MOVIES 1952 MOVIES 1951 MOVIES 1950 MOVIES 1949 MOVIES 1948 MOVIES 1947 MOVIES 1946 MOVIES 1945 MOVIES 1944 MOVIES 1943 MOVIES 1942 MOVIES 1941 MOVIES 1940 MOVIES 1939 MOVIES 1938 MOVIES 1937 MOVIES 1936 MOVIES 1935 MOVIES 1934 MOVIES 1933 MOVIES 1932 MOVIES 1931 MOVIES 1930 MOVIES 1929 MOVIES 1928 MOVIES 1927 MOVIES 1926 MOVIES 1925 MOVIES 1924 MOVIES 1923 MOVIES 1922 MOVIES 1921 MOVIES 1920 MOVIES 1919 MOVIES 1918 MOVIES 1917 MOVIES 1916 MOVIES 1915 MOVIES 1914 MOVIES 1913 MOVIES 1912 MOVIES 1911 MOVIES 1910 MOVIES ![]() |
STEP BROTHERS Two spoiled guys become competitive stepbrothers after their single parents get hitched. REVIEW: Is this the end of Will Ferrell? I never thought I'd say that but it seems that his career has hit the skids. Even teaming up with his most successful writing partner and director Adam McKay (Anchorman, Talledaga Nights), hasn't done him any good in Step Brothers. Full disclosure: I am a huge fan of Will Ferrell, Adam McKay and John C. Reilly. I think Anchorman is one of the greatest movies in history. Not greatest comedy, but greatest movie! So as a reviewer, I hoped this would be a great film. Never have I wanted more for a movie to be good this year than Step Brothers. But it's not a good film and I am saddened by it. What went wrong? This is a film that seemed rushed. There are many great moments in this film but there are more not so great moments. I don't think they truly knew what they were trying to say. The two character's Ferrell and Reilly play are basically losers who have never grown up. At age 40, they still live with their parents and have no career or life prospects on the horizon. They are emotionally blocked human beings and something needs to happen. In many ways this concept is funny, but it's also extremely pathetic and sad. The art of comedy is to make sure that it's much more funny than it is sad and Director Adam McKay was fighting a losing battle in this film. This is a Hollywood movie that really should of been an indy dark-comedy type of film. In the script and in the direction, McKay needed to make sure that people liked these the Step Brothers. But that's hard when they do things that are so stupid and insensitive, you want to cry for them more than laugh at and with them. They should of just made the movie I think they wanted to make and I don't think they did that. One of the easy rules of comedy is have these types of loser characters not in on the joke. So they think they're fine even though everyone laughs at them. But these guys know their losers and so do we, so it's not that funny. Imagine laughing at someone who's mentally challenged in real life! You'd have to be a real jerk to do that and I just couldn't laugh at some of the many things they were doing. Another problem is the antagonist who is one of the step brother's younger brother. He's successful but the price he's paid for it is being a jackass. This character has too many cliches and is just not funny either. A wasted character in a movie that can't have one. You wonder what ever happened to the funny bad guy in movies. They have great villains in drama and action films, but not comedy. Why? These types of characters should be the funniest ones in the film. Is it the star's ego where they need to be the funniest people in the film and not the newer comedy actor who's playing a sidekick or villain role? Without saying any names, this does happen in the industry a lot, especially with the comic stars. I don't know if it happened in Step Brothers, but it does make me wonder. To summarize and repeat, I don't think they really knew what they were trying to say in this film either. They came up with a theme (the art of life is being childlike and adultlike!) at the end of the 3rd act because they needed an ending. And the irony is that the 3rd act is some of the best stuff in the film. It makes you wonder why they didn't start where they finished. Comedies especially need a theme. If we know what they're talking about, it makes it funnier for the audience because we are completely involved in the film. We emotionally involved and when you care, you laugh - bottom line. Think back to your favorite comedy films and you'll see a great theme in it.Step Brothers is just trying to make us laugh and they only work 50% of the time. Ferrell and Reilly are such great actors, they are funny even when they aren't trying to be. So this isn't an entirely bad film, it just doesn't work most of the time. 2 stars out of 4! CLICK HERE and read The Dark Knight essay from a female fan's perspective. center>
Return from Step Brothers to home page |
|||||||||||||