SPIDER-MAN 2, 2004
|
 |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Search WILDsound
2009 MOVIE REVIEWS
WATCH SHORT FILMS
WATCH VIRAL VIDEOS
MOVIE/TV BLOGS
BOX OFFICE RESULTS
MOVIE TRAILERS
OUT ON DVD
SUPERHERO NEWS
SPIDER-MAN 2, 2004
Movie Reviews
Directed by Sam Raimi
Starring: Tobey Maguire, Alfred Molina, James Franco, Kirsten Dunst, Rosemary Harris
Review by Andrew Kosarko
The webslinging superhero encounters a new nemesis, the villainous "Doc Ock," who will be portrayed by Alfred Molina (Frida, Identity). Two years have passed, and the mild-mannered Peter Parker faces new challenges as he struggles with "the gift and the curse," desperately trying to balance his dual identities as the web-slinging superhero Spider-Man and his life as a college student. Tormented by his secrets, Peter finds that his relationships with all those he holds dear are in danger of unraveling. His life-long yearning for M.J. (Kirsten Dunst) becomes even stronger as he fights the impulse to reveal his secret life and declare his love. His friendship with Harry Osborn (James Franco) is complicated by the young Osborn's bitterness over his father's death and his growing vendetta against Spider-Man. Even Peter's beloved Aunt May (Rosemary Harris), who has fallen on hard times after the death of Uncle Ben, begins to have doubts about her nephew. Peter's life is about to become even more complicated as he encounters a formidable new foe -- Dr. Otto Octavius (Alfred Molina). Peter must use all the powers at his disposal to try to stop this diabolical madman in his octagonal tracks.
REVIEW:
Quite simply one of the greatest Superhero movies ever made. Perfectly balanced in story, acting, directing, production design and emotion. I remember when Batman Begins came out on DVD, this is the movie I always watched right after in order to satisfy my thirst for the second chapter in a superhero movie. And it always did.
The Story:
The story gets right into it. In terms of theme that is. It ain’t easy being a superhero. It’s another obligation a man must fulfill and yet, he can’t explain himself to the people he lets down. This could create some problems for anyone. And it does for Peter Parker. Mary Jane is waiting for Peter to make his move on her and he won’t. Aunt May is suffering financially and trying to stay afloat. Harry is waiting for his best friend to help him out and turn in Spider-man. Peter can’t keep a job and is failing his classes. His apartment isn’t one worthy of his good deeds….you get the point. Life sucks because of Spider-man. I won’t regurgitate the plot anymore, but this story hits the mark as to how complicated it would be to do this job.
Superman II touched lightly on this, but never took it at far as it could go. In movies, take the story as far as you can and they do it. The plot is well structured in story and character exposition. Not only do we get a look into Peter’s decisions but the emotional turmoil he’s dealing with when he makes them. It’s fantastic. Above all that, they pull no punches and hold nothing back. Harry finds out about Peter’s secret, Aunt May pretty much explains she knows who Peter is without saying it and Mary Jane just cuts him loose and gets engaged. My only complain about the writing in the film is the comedy. While the film cannot, and should not be called “emo” it does have it’s somber tones throughout. Spider-man has one quip the entire film. While he is losing his desire to be Spider-man, it’s still in his personality to antagonize the person he’s fighting with the one-liners. It’s what makes him so enjoyable. And he has one smart ass remark that’s not at all laugh out loud funny. But it’s just a nitpick.
Acting: Tis better this go around…..
Tobey Maguire - Peter Parker / Spider-man: He takes the cake. Simply put, I believed he was going through some tough times in his life and had no way to deal with them without sacrificing something dear to him. His promise and duty or his personal desires. Everything was spot on and wasn’t as “wooden” as usual. Maguire really hit this one out of the park.
Kirsten Dunst – Mary Jane Watson: She’s just as bitchy and mean in this one as she is the other 2 Spider-man films to date, but at least in this film, he story dictates it and I can live with it. It’s not annoying as usual, but it’s still good.
James Franco – Harry Osbourn: He was the only one that I felt was a little lacking in this film. For whatever reason, maybe it’s the weak writing behind his hatred for Spider-man, but everything seems overly forced. Black and white acting in a way. He’s either really eager to help Peter, or dead set against him for not turning Spider-man over to him. There’s no motivation behind the two that really helps him along the story. He’s more of an element in the story than a character.
Alfred Molina – Dr. Otto Octavius: A tragic villain sure. But I was hoping for a more sinister character. He’s slightly changed from his comic book roots, but I buy it. He does a great job and serves his purpose in the story. I was fully satisfied and didn’t feel the need to see him return.
Rosemary Harris / Cliff Robertson: Aunt May / Uncle Ben – Always good. They make for the best two moments of the film. Uncle Ben hits the saddest beat when he offers Peter his hand in the dream sequence. And then Aunt May lifts us back up with the greatest Superhero speech ever written ever. Trumps anything the Dark Knight ever wanted to spew out it’s speeches.
JK Simmons: JJ Jameson – He’s great. I just wish there would be more of him in the films. He doesn’t get enough screen time. In the comics, cartoons and video games they use him as a victim that Spider-man must save. Always an interesting take for the Superhero to save the guy who hates him. But still, Simmons IS Jameson.
Directing:
Sam Raimi hit the mark on this film as with the first. A perfect balance of everything and it all plays so believable that you really just can’t help but get into it.
Cinematography:
Bill Pope – A great job. It’s beautiful again. Once again capturing the balance between comic book and film. This time everything has much more color value and the lighting schemes are much more interesting.
Production Design:
Good as well, everything was a great transition from the comic book. Editing: No real problems here.
Score:
A better go than the first Spider-man’s score. This one hits more emotional chords, but then again, Elfman has a lot broader of a range of emotions to play for which is good. The uplifting moments and sad moments are made so much more than they are through the music. And it’s very easy to make something cheesy with the wrong note or the wrong piece in the wrong moment. There was a lot of room to fail and he did well. It’s a shame that he didn’t do the whole score because of disagreements with Raimi so I’m not entirely sure which moments are his and which are by Christopher Young. Regardless, job well done. Special Effects:
Really great. Doc Ock’s arms are completely believable and fit with the style of the film. Spider-man’s CGI double was also very believable at times. You wouldn’t even know it was a CGI if it weren’t for the special features.
In closing:
It’s PERFECT…..err….almost. That wise-ass Spider-man still bothers me a bit. But yeah. Raimi understands the balance between plot and character exposition. Something I wish Chris Nolan had understood when he made The Dark Knight. If any film rivals TDK, it’s this one. I don’t care what other fanboys say, because they are quick to jump on bandwagons and refuse to get off them. But this movie holds it’s own and is pure gold for anyone of the comic book genre.
And thank God no Macy Grey in this one.
| 1920s Movie Reviews 1920 Reviews 1921 Reviews 1922 Reviews 1923 Reviews 1924 Reviews 1925 Reviews 1926 Reviews 1927 Reviews 1928 Reviews 1929 Reviews 1950s Movie Reviews 1950 Reviews 1951 Reviews 1952 Reviews 1953 Reviews 1954 Reviews 1955 Reviews 1956 Reviews 1957 Reviews 1958 Reviews 1959 Reviews 1980s Movie Reviews 1980 Reviews 1981 Reviews 1982 Reviews 1983 Reviews 1984 Reviews 1985 Reviews 1986 Reviews 1987 Reviews 1988 Reviews 1989 Reviews | 1930s Movie Reviews 1930 Reviews 1931 Reviews 1932 Reviews 1933 Reviews 1934 Reviews 1935 Reviews 1936 Reviews 1937 Reviews 1938 Reviews 1939 Reviews 1960s Movie Reviews 1960 Reviews 1961 Reviews 1962 Reviews 1963 Reviews 1964 Reviews 1965 Reviews 1966 Reviews 1967 Reviews 1968 Reviews 1969 Reviews 1990s Movie Reviews 1990 Reviews 1991 Reviews 1992 Reviews 1993 Reviews 1994 Reviews 1995 Reviews 1996 Reviews 1997 Reviews 1998 Reviews 1999 Reviews | 1940s Movie Reviews 1940 Reviews 1941 Reviews 1942 Reviews 1943 Reviews 1944 Reviews 1945 Reviews 1946 Reviews 1947 Reviews 1948 Reviews 1949 Reviews 1970s Movie Reviews 1970 Reviews 1971 Reviews 1972 Reviews 1973 Reviews 1974 Reviews 1975 Reviews 1976 Reviews 1979 Reviews 1978 Reviews 1979 Reviews 2000s Movie Reviews 2000 Reviews 2001 Reviews 2002 Reviews 2003 Reviews 2004 Reviews 2005 Reviews 2006 Reviews 2007 Reviews 2008 Reviews 2009 Reviews | Genre Movie Reviews Action Movies Adventure Movies Animation Movies Biography Movies Comedy Movies Comic Movies Crime Movies Drama Movies Family Movies Fantasy Movies Film Noir Movies History Movies Horror Movies Musical Movies Romance Movies Sci-Fi Movies Sports Movies Thriller Movies War Movies Western Movies WATCH SHORT FILMS Drama Shorts Comedy Shorts Horror Shorts Action Shorts Animation Shorts Thriller Shorts DOC Shorts Experimental Musical Shorts 1min. Shorts Viral Shorts |
