![]() |
||||||||||
![]() |
It’s actually “Night at the Museum 2: Battle of the Smithsonian”, which is far too wordy a title for a summer release. (And the subtitle is lazily left out of the trailer.) But it does serve to tell us all we need to know here, which is that this is the second installment of the Museum franchise, and said museum this time around is the Smithsonian, (the museum “big leagues”, apparently). CLICK HERE and watch 2009 MOVIES FOR FREE! REVIEW: To prepare for this film I watched a lot of sequel comedy films. Movies that were made because the first film was such a hit, they found themselves in the position of making another one because the studios wanted it and it will pay the original creative team a much higher salary to come back. Plus, it's almost like a reunion for everyone to come back, reprise their roles and crew positions and have another fun ride for 3-5 months while also making a film in the process. There are a few problems with this scenario though. #1 - The original film had an official ending and there was no intention to make another one. So they have to figure out a crazy story so everyone would be back in their usual situations. It's forced writing and this type of writing is dangerous because it doesn't come from a natural creative situation. #2 - There isn't anymore pressure because they know the studios will treat this film right and market it to the masses. So, many times they are perhaps having more fun than necessary on set. Think Ocean's 12 and City Slickers 2. #3 - There is a style to the jokes in the original film that the writers and actors have created almost organically that define the emotional arc and overall laughter which made the film a hit in the first place. Now they must recreate that charm on set and what happens is that it's forced. No one laughs when people are trying too hard to make us laugh. Laughter needs to come from a relaxed place not from a mechanical place. It's almost like a robot trying to tell Chris Rock's stand-up jokes. They wouldn't be funny because Chris Rock isn't telling them. Night at the Museum 2 is not as enjoyable to watch as the first film because the original had the ultimate fish out of water conflict hanging over the main character (and we the audience because we are seeing what they see) throughout. He's no longer out of the water but swimming comfortably amongst the wax figures who've come to life. So really there isn't nearly as much conflict as the first film. And 99 times out of a 100, the more conflict in a comedy, the funnier the film. That said, Night at the Museum 2 isn't as bad as most sequel comedies. There is a certain charm to this film after the first act, which just took way too long to get going. It's the new characters that appear in the film that make this an entertaining movie for both kids and adults to see (plus educational too). Hank Azaria does triple duty (much like what he does for The Simpsons) playing Kahmunrah, the films main antagonist who is also very funny (naturally). Plus, he also does the voices of The Thinker and the giant Abe Lincoln (who is the twist of the film - enough said!). Azaria is terrific playing Kahnunrah, especially the scene when he rounds up his new team of generals in Al Capone, Napoleon and Ivan the Terrible. Amy Adams plays Amelia Earhart, Stiller's sidekick plus possible love interest. I joked in a recent PODCAST that Stiller falling for a wax figure is a strange storyline for a kids film. But they played this plot very well and Amelia Earhart is a terrific role model for all the young woman and men out there. A historical figure that we all should know about (and soon to be a movie starring Hilary Swank). Adams is turning into a Meryl Streep like actress who is able to act in any genre. This is someone who has a terrific future ahead of her. I enjoyed this film. It's theme is a cliche but a good one to recycle. To do what you love and spend time with the people you love. What our main character learns at the end. Something Ben Stiller playing that main character seemed to figure out a long time ago. This is a guy who makes about three films a year and always works with all of his friends. And why not? He loves making films and will do is as long as they let him. And looking at his recent successes, it's something he should be doing for a long time. The formula of doing a kids film, then an adult film, then his own film and back to a kids film. It seem to work. But please, no Night at the Museum 3. Battle of the Smithsonian should be the last one. CLICK HERE and read reviews of every film from 2008 CLICK HERE and see what's OUT ON DVD right now! CLICK HERE and read MOVIE REVIEWS of all the TOP Films at the box office today! Review by Gabrielle Domingues CLICK HERE and watch 2009 MOVIES FOR FREE! CLICK HERE and WATCH more 2009 Movie Trailers REVIEW: Disclaimer: I never saw Museum #1; but I do believe I have the gist of it via pop-culture osmosis. This one looks to be more of the same, albeit with more characters and effects and hi-jinx, as is the way with comedy/action sequels in general. “I’ve seen things you cannot imagine.” I can’t imagine this trailer making me want to see this movie; so, let’s see...! We’ve got Robin Williams and Owen Wilson both back reprising their original characters, (Teddy Roosevelt and Jedediah Smith, respectively), and Hank Azaria has me giggling with his thickly accented and hilariously aggrandizing “I HAVE COME BACK TO LIFE” as Kah Mun Rah. But, I have no idea who that’s supposed to be. I do pleasantly recognize Amy Adams, another newbie here as Amelia Earhart; (a charming actress, who I believe is much lovelier than the actual Earhart was). And it’s always reassuring comedically-speaking to see Ricky Gervais. There are some others running around whom I’m not sure if they’re new characters or not, and I’m not particularly interested…. Even a space shuttle launch gets thrown into the mix, and that just smacks of desperation! I kid. In a film where the Lincoln Memorial and The Thinker come to life, it’s really not possible to jump the shark. I just wish those animated statues didn’t look so darn cheesy; I mean, I would wish so, if I actually cared at all…. I think the main reason I’m not engaged with this franchise, truthfully, is that I don’t really like museums! Whenever I was or am in one, it’s pretty much because I was dragged there for some “it’s good for you” reason; (as a student, or now for my son’s sake). A comedy about a museum should have the opposite feel to it, but somehow the location trappings manage to conjure only those old same feelings of dread. Animatronic and claymation artifacts are still dull – and now also, creepy! But the first Museum made a monument-al load of cash, so if I’d paid attention in math class I myself could do the calculations that justified this sequel…. I was, and still am, a student of the arts. What I can find in this offering is a colorful and comedically talented cast. What feels lacking is any emotional arch or stakes. Hilarity and wonderment have most impact when experienced in the context of relationships. In that respect, the significance of this movie to me is that I can take my son – instead of taking him to a museum. [Bonus trivia: What one other movie features the characters of Lincoln & Napoleon? Get the answer in this week’s review of Terminator Salvation!] Night at the Museum 2 will admit the kid set this weekend, but will pale in Terminator’s box-office shadow.
earth
Return from NIGHT AT THE MUSEUM 2 to home page
|
|||||||||