![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() STUDIOS SET FOR ALMOST $1 BILLION IN FILM PRODUCTION After mostly sitting on the sidelines since the June 30 expiration of the SAG contract, studios are preparing to put 40 or more films into production between spring and summer. Hundreds of millions of dollars in production financing will be committed to fill slates for 2010 and 2011, signaling the end of the de facto thesp strike that has kept pic production at a low ebb for nearly a year. With a handful of exceptions, the majors mostly stopped greenlighting films in October 2007, which led to a large number of productions that wrapped before June 30. Studios are ready to replicate that pre-strike rush by creating the same kind of boom market for production starting early next year. Studio toppers are moving forward with a healthy level of anxiety. The recent credit crunch won’t impact the next batch of film starts, execs said, because that money has already been secured and budgeted. And there’s clear evidence that audiences will continue to come to theaters, even if the economy remains in the toilet by the time these films are released. Studios are more nervous about the financial exposure they face if SAG does go on strike. But the prospect of gaping holes in their distribution slates for 2010 and 2011 is a worse scenario for the majors, and so they are willing to risk the consequences of moving ahead despite the SAG uncertainty. Films like "Terminator Salvation," "Transformers 2," "Angels & Demons," "Night at the Museum 2" and "2012" went into production after the expiration of the SAG contract, and each of those productions worked in strike contingencies that ranged from agreements with stage houses to shut down and leave sets intact to deals with cast members to return 48 hours after a strike is settled.
MOVIE REVIEWS of all the TOP FILMS DEBATE #2 EXPECTED TO BE RATINGS SCORE It may not get the ratings of last Thursday's Palin-Biden debate, but Tuesday's town hall meeting with John McCain and Barack Obama will probably do better than their first debate. No one is making the same mistake this time around as they did for the first debate Sept. 26 in Oxford, Miss., where the Commission on Presidential Debates figured it could be record-breaking given the high interest all campaign season. Those hopes were dashed the next day when it failed to attract even the same level as the first Bush-Kerry debate in 2004. Nielsen Media Research estimated that 52.4 million viewers tuned in for the first McCain-Obama debate. It's unlikely that this matchup will draw the 70 million that their running mates, Sarah Palin and Joe Biden, got Thursday in the best debate performance in years. Tuesday's debate has a better night for primetime than the Mississippi debate, however, which came in on the second-lowest-rated night for TV all week. "I think Sarah will still be the leader after tonight," Fox News Channel anchor Chris Wallace said Tuesday from Nashville. "They'll get a bigger audience (compared to the first debate) because Tuesday night is a better night for television than Friday." Lenny Steinhorn, a communications professor at American University in Washington, is bullish on the ratings. "It'll be substantial. It's the middle of the week, unlike the last presidential debate, which was on a Friday night," Steinhorn said. "As much as people are interested in this election, they are not organizing their lives around it."The TV viewership may not be as strong as the pundits hope. Horizon Media research chief Brad Adgate said that there are plenty of ways to check out the debate without having to see it -- and more viewing alternatives than ever before. "I can't see this doing any more than (the 70 million for the vp debate or the 52.4 million for the last debate), Adgate said. News October 8, News October 8, News October 8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||