Home
NEW TODAY
Today's ET NEWS
Nov. 27 SCRIPTS
Nov. 28 FREE EVENT
SUBMIT A SCRIPT
SUBMIT your FILM
TV Pilot Contest
One Page Contest
Watch Short Films
Funny Viral Videos
FREE MOVIES
POEMS
Film Fest Videos
Film Notes/Ideas
Movie Reviews
Classic Reviews
Wildcard Pictures
GET OUR E-ZINE!
WILDsound FAQ
CONTACT US

Subscribe To This Site
XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines
 

DRACULA, 1992
Movie Review

Dracula

helpimagehelpimage









Search WILDsound
WATCH the Best of Film Festivals
SUBSCRIBE to the Film Festival
YOUTUBE Group!
TOP WILDsound Pages
2009 MOVIE GENRES2009 MOVIE REVIEWS
Drama Movies
Comedy Movies
Action Movies
Thriller Movies
Animation Movies
Horror Movies
Kids Movies
Romance Movies
Adventure Movies
Crime Movies
Fantasy Movies
Mystery Movies
Sport Movies
War Movies
Biography Movies
Comic Book Movies
History Movies
Sci-Fi Movies
2009 Movie Columns
WATCH 2009 MOVIESWATCH SHORT FILMS

Best films from all over the world!
VIRAL MOVIESWATCH VIRAL VIDEOS

Funny/Insightful films everyday!
MOVIE BLOGSMOVIE/TV BLOGS

Daily columns from our pundits!
BOX OFFICE RESULTSBOX OFFICE RESULTS

Daily domestic results!
2009 MOVIE TRAILERSMOVIE TRAILERS

Best of what's coming up!
OUT ON DVDOUT ON DVD

What's out on DVD and BluRay!
DRACULA MOVIE POSTER
DRACULA, 1992
Movie Reviews

Directed by Francis Ford Coppola
Starring: Gary Oldman, Keanu Reeves, Anthony Hopkins, Winona Ryder
Review by Emma Hutchings



SYNOPSIS:

Young lawyer Jonathan Harker is sent to Transylvania to finalise the sale of a property in London. There he is imprisoned by Count Dracula, who travels to London determined to find Harker’s betrothed Mina Murray, convinced she is the reincarnation of his lost love after seeing her picture. But Van Helsing and his companions stand in the way of Dracula’s quest for true love, seeking revenge for his murder of Mina’s friend Lucy.

OSCAR WINNER for Best Costume Design, Best Effects, Sound Effects Editing, Best Make-up

OSCAR NOMINEE for Best Art Direction-Set Decoration

CLICK HERE and watch 2009 MOVIES FOR FREE!

REVIEW:

Bram Stoker’s Dracula begins by showing audiences the story of how the man became the monster. It is a tragic tale; Vlad the Impaler, a righteous warrior, marches off to the Holy Land to fight in the Crusades only to return later and find that his beloved wife Elisabeta has thrown herself to her doom after hearing reports that he was killed in battle. Vlad cannot see how God could let such a thing happen, he renounces him and by doing so, curses himself to an everlasting life of bloodlust and mourning as the vampire Dracula.

Much of the action then takes place between a late Victorian London and Dracula’s home in Transylvania. Jonathan Harker travels to Transylvania to meet Count Dracula and arrange his purchase of a property in London, but when the Count spots a portrait of Harker’s soon-to-be wife Mina, he sees his beloved Elisabeta reincarnated (a bit of a coincidence!). So, leaving Harker trapped in his castle with only the three brides for company (poor man), Dracula heads for London for a reunion with his true love. Mina must subsequently decide between this new mysterious man she finds herself attracted to, and Jonathan. Meanwhile, her friend Lucy falls ill with an inexplicable disease of the blood, causing worry for her three suitors, who decide to consult an expert in the field, Professor Abraham Van Helsing.

This film is based on Bram Stoker’s 1897 novel and is adapted by American screenwriter James V. Hart. It takes a few liberties with the book; the film includes a lot more romantic scenes and is more of a tragic love story. However, the film does retain certain elements of the novel that are usually emitted from Dracula films and vampire films in general, including the idea that Dracula can move about during daylight hours. The notion of vampires being destroyed by sunlight was invented by motion pictures. It was first used in Nosferatu (1922) and has been continued in films such as Blade and Underworld as well as TV series’, most famously, Buffy the Vampire Slayer. However, it isn’t part of vampire folklore at all. Original lore stated that vampires only became powerful after sundown and that during the day they were required to return to their graves or coffins. They could still move around if they wished, they just didn’t have any supernatural abilities.

As for the romantic elements added to the film, these result in it feeling far more like a doomed Gothic love story than a horror. The beginning is reminiscent of Romeo & Juliet, if Juliet had chosen to become a vampire rather than kill herself. The tag line for the film is simply ‘Love Never Dies’. What the film effectively does is humanise the famous blood-sucking, murderous villain. As a result, I often found myself sympathising with Dracula’s plight and hoping it’d work out between him and Mina. He deserved some good luck. All he wanted was to be happy and he had his true love cruelly snatched away from him. This sympathy may also have been caused by some truly awful acting by Keanu Reeves, playing Jonathan Harker. His terrible English accent and wooden performance left me struggling to identify with the man who is the supposed hero of the story and wishing his soon-to-be bride would ditch him for the far more appealing Dracula.

The other actors in the film are far more effective. Winona Ryder does a decent job as a likeable Mina Murray, Anthony Hopkins’ Van Helsing is a quirky, eccentric Professor with a wry sense of humour and Gary Oldman does brilliantly with his roles as Vlad, Dracula old and young, as well as some monstrous versions. I think his performance as the older Count is the most successful, with his playful yet sinister demeanour; “You will, I trust, excuse me if I do not join you. But I have already dined, and I never drink...wine.”

Bram Stoker’s Dracula has many plus points. Above all it is a very stylishly directed film. Francis Ford Coppola said the film pays homage to others of the genre, pointing out the shot of Dracula rising out of his coffin (a homage to F. W. Murnau’s Nosferatu (1922)). Also, the blood splashing onto Lucy’s bed from the sides of the room is a homage to Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining (1980) and Lucy vomiting blood all over Van Helsing is a homage to William Friedkin’s The Exorcist (1973).

The film also benefits from some great sets, costumes and make-up. In fact, everything you see on-screen is impressive. It does suffer slightly in terms of story though. The basic plot is quite simple but there is a lot of switching back and forth between London and Transylvania, there are many different sub-plots and the film is just too long. I do imagine it would be fairly difficult to develop a coherent narrative from the novel though, as it is made up of letters and diary entries from the various characters.

Bram Stoker’s Dracula is an enjoyable movie, although it might not be what you expect. It’s very heavy on spectacle but rather light on substance. I wanted more from a film about the most famous vampire ever; I wanted more history and an explanation of how exactly he became a vampire; I wanted a darker, more exciting story because mourning his lost love just seemed a bit pathetic for Dracula. Anyway, aren’t vampires supposed to lose their soul? Why does he care? He’s supposed to be a blood-sucking monster! So if you’re looking for a horror film with vampires, you may want to look elsewhere. However, if you’re looking for a love film with vampires, this is definitely one to watch.
MOVIE REVIEWS by YEAR and GENRE
Director Movie Reviews
PT Anderson
Wes Anderson
Ingmar Bergman
Mel Brooks
Tim Burton
James Cameron
Frank Capra
Charlie Chaplin
Coen Brothers
Francis Coppola
Clint Eastwood
Federico Fellini
John Ford
Marc Forster
Alfred Hitchcock
John Huston
Elia Kazan
Stanley Kubrick
Akira Kurosawa
McG
Sam Mendes
Christopher Nolan
Tyler Perry
Roman Polanski
Otto Preminger
Sam Raimi
Jean Renoir
Martin Scorsese
Ridley Scott
Tony Scott
Steven Spielberg
Steven Soderbergh
Orson Welles
Billy Wilder
Robert Zemeckis
1920s Movie Reviews
1920 Reviews
1921 Reviews
1922 Reviews
1923 Reviews
1924 Reviews
1925 Reviews
1926 Reviews
1927 Reviews
1928 Reviews
1929 Reviews

1950s Movie Reviews
1950 Reviews
1951 Reviews
1952 Reviews
1953 Reviews
1954 Reviews
1955 Reviews
1956 Reviews
1957 Reviews
1958 Reviews
1959 Reviews

1980s Movie Reviews
1980 Reviews
1981 Reviews
1982 Reviews
1983 Reviews
1984 Reviews
1985 Reviews
1986 Reviews
1987 Reviews
1988 Reviews
1989 Reviews
1930s Movie Reviews
1930 Reviews
1931 Reviews
1932 Reviews
1933 Reviews
1934 Reviews
1935 Reviews
1936 Reviews
1937 Reviews
1938 Reviews
1939 Reviews

1960s Movie Reviews
1960 Reviews
1961 Reviews
1962 Reviews
1963 Reviews
1964 Reviews
1965 Reviews
1966 Reviews
1967 Reviews
1968 Reviews
1969 Reviews

1990s Movie Reviews
1990 Reviews
1991 Reviews
1992 Reviews
1993 Reviews
1994 Reviews
1995 Reviews
1996 Reviews
1997 Reviews
1998 Reviews
1999 Reviews
1940s Movie Reviews
1940 Reviews
1941 Reviews
1942 Reviews
1943 Reviews
1944 Reviews
1945 Reviews
1946 Reviews
1947 Reviews
1948 Reviews
1949 Reviews

1970s Movie Reviews
1970 Reviews
1971 Reviews
1972 Reviews
1973 Reviews
1974 Reviews
1975 Reviews
1976 Reviews
1979 Reviews
1978 Reviews
1979 Reviews

2000s Movie Reviews
2000 Reviews
2001 Reviews
2002 Reviews
2003 Reviews
2004 Reviews
2005 Reviews
2006 Reviews
2007 Reviews
2008 Reviews
2009 Reviews
Genre Movie Reviews
Action Movies
Adventure Movies
Animation Movies
Biography Movies
Comedy Movies
Comic Movies
Crime Movies
Drama Movies
Family Movies
Fantasy Movies
Film Noir Movies
History Movies
Horror Movies
Musical Movies
Romance Movies
Sci-Fi Movies
Sports Movies
Thriller Movies
War Movies
Western Movies

WATCH SHORT FILMS
Drama Shorts
Comedy Shorts
Horror Shorts
Action Shorts
Animation Shorts
Thriller Shorts
DOC Shorts
Experimental
Musical Shorts
1min. Shorts
Viral Shorts



Dracula


footer for Dracula page