![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
SEE AND WATCH BEST of NATALIE PORTMAN
SYNOPSIS: Ben Affleck as Matt Murdock / Daredevil: An attorney-at-law with a disability. He was blinded as a youth in a radioactive accident that also drastically heightened his remaining senses and gave him a "radar-sense", which allowed him to perceive his surroundings. After this, he makes a silent promise with his father to "stick up for the long shots". His father is killed not long after and at that moment, he vows to seeks justice by any means. At night, Murdock becomes Daredevil, and takes justice into his hands. REVIEW: I must preface my review by saying that I’m reviewing the DIRECTORS CUT and not the original film. Many times, when you buy a directors cut, there’s some added scenes and you’re like “oh….that’s a nice little treat.” Not in this case. Not at all in this case. And most definitely, not in the way you think…. The Story: The story is somewhat strong. You’re not really sure where it’s going most of the time, but it’s interesting enough to hold your attention. The Elektra storyline, in my opinion is completely un-needed and in the studio cut completely hinders the film. You can tell some executive suit had his hands meddling in the story. When you see the directors cut, it’s used as a tool for our main hero’s story. It emphasizes the hurt and loneliness that Matt Murdock is going through as daredevil and helps separate him from most superheroes of modern day. Case in point, when he hears sirens and Elektra asks him to stay. In the studio cut, he stays with her. As a fan boy, I slam my head through a wall. In the directors cut, he leaves.YES! It was a stand up and cheer moment to see something like that changed. In my opinion, it’s little character development things like that that say so much more and are far more interesting than extended scenes that give you more un-needed insight into the plot. The main plot of Matt Murdock tracking down and taking on the Kingpin is flimsy at times, and you wonder why it takes so long for him to decide to go after him. But when he does…it’s somewhat of a let down. The fight isn’t built up to all that well. They make Kingpin into an “honorable” thug. Which, in the comics, he’s not. He sends the guards home in the film. In the comics, Daredevil would have fight his way to the top to take on Kingpin. This robbed us of some great action sequences in my opinion. All so we could see Daredevil fight Kingpin fresh under some water. Overall, it’s satisfying as a story, but nothing to write home about. Acting: I’m going to seem a little lazy in this, but I assure you, I’m not. There is no way I can rate the acting in the film by each actor. There’s very little “emotion” in everyone. It’s just flat overall. No one steals the show, and not one of them “falls behind.” I really can’t put it into words how I feel about the acting. It’s just, “indescribably boring.” Directing: The fault on Mark Steven Johnson is that his heart is in the right place, but I’m not sure his abilities are up to par as a film director. The stories would work great in comic books, but not on film. The directing, in terms of emotional turns, doesn’t seem to be there. Everything is flat and dry to me. Forced even at some points. Almost as if a recent film school graduate was directing. I mean, it’s not deplorable by any means. Certainly a watchable movie. But in the end, it doesn’t feel like it has much heart in it. Cinematography: Like the other Marvel movies (Spider-man, Iron Man, X-Men) this film has a strong sense of color direction and is very well translated from comics to film. The shots are well done and very poetic, which is nice. Daredevil has always had a religious undertone so to feel that kind of “mood” in the film was a great addition. Production Design: Like I stated above, Marvel does a great job of translating both their shots and their worlds from comic to film. I see the strong color and the styles of the world, but I still think of comics and yet, don’t feel as though I’m not in a realistic setting. Editing: Most definitely one of the best edited films for the Superhero genre. I’m not talking overall cut to cut editing, I mean by the structure of the film as a narrative whole. Granted, I haven’t read the script for this film, but from watching it numerous times there’s a feeling that most of it was sculpted in the editing room. Especially when comparing the studio cut and the DC. Score: Easily forgettable. Marvel’s biggest fault in it’s films is finding a voice for it’s heroes through their music. The best yet has been Iron Man, and that’s only because of Ozzy Osbourne. Special Effects: Strong. Not Spider-man 3 strong. But up there. The fight scenes are well done, are as the intrusive effects for Daredevil’s superpowers. In closing: I’d like to add the last, curveball for why this film is better than the studio cut. Mr. Gangster’s Paradise himself – Coolio. That’s right I said it. There is a whole side plot line with Coolio as a framed criminal that Matt Murdock defends because he can tell he’s truthfull even though tons of evidence and witnesses say different. It’s not only VERY interesting, but it adds insight to Murdock’s character and stands as a metaphor for the Superhero’s view of his city and his resolve to do what he believes is right. All in all, this film has many of the strong points and weak points of a Marvel film, but shows the depth and potential that a lot of lower-tier Marvel heroes have. It’s only sad that this wasn’t the version shown in theatres. If it had been, Daredevil would have been revered just as highly as Spider-man, Iron Man and the X-men. But who would have known that a lack of Coolio would have been the strongest fault?
Return from DAREDEVIL to home page |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||