![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
HOME PAGE Movie Videos Films by Year Films by Director Films by Actor Films by Actress Films by Alphabet Film Characters Film Franchises TOP 100 MOVIES in 2008! 2013 MOVIES 2012 MOVIES 2011 MOVIES 2010 MOVIES 2009 MOVIES 2008 MOVIES 2007 MOVIES 2006 MOVIES 2005 MOVIES 2004 MOVIES 2003 MOVIES 2002 MOVIES 2001 MOVIES 2000 MOVIES 1999 MOVIES 1998 MOVIES 1997 MOVIES 1996 MOVIES 1995 MOVIES 1994 MOVIES 1993 MOVIES 1992 MOVIES 1991 MOVIES 1990 MOVIES 1989 MOVIES 1988 MOVIES 1987 MOVIES 1986 MOVIES 1985 MOVIES 1984 MOVIES 1983 MOVIES 1982 MOVIES 1981 MOVIES 1980 MOVIES 1979 MOVIES 1978 MOVIES 1977 MOVIES 1976 MOVIES 1975 MOVIES 1974 MOVIES 1973 MOVIES 1972 MOVIES 1971 MOVIES 1970 MOVIES 1969 MOVIES 1968 MOVIES 1967 MOVIES 1966 MOVIES 1965 MOVIES 1964 MOVIES 1963 MOVIES 1962 MOVIES 1961 MOVIES 1960 MOVIES 1959 MOVIES 1958 MOVIES 1957 MOVIES 1956 MOVIES 1955 MOVIES 1954 MOVIES 1953 MOVIES 1952 MOVIES 1951 MOVIES 1950 MOVIES 1949 MOVIES 1948 MOVIES 1947 MOVIES 1946 MOVIES 1945 MOVIES 1944 MOVIES 1943 MOVIES 1942 MOVIES 1941 MOVIES 1940 MOVIES 1939 MOVIES 1938 MOVIES 1937 MOVIES 1936 MOVIES 1935 MOVIES 1934 MOVIES 1933 MOVIES 1932 MOVIES 1931 MOVIES 1930 MOVIES 1929 MOVIES 1928 MOVIES 1927 MOVIES 1926 MOVIES 1925 MOVIES 1924 MOVIES 1923 MOVIES 1922 MOVIES 1921 MOVIES 1920 MOVIES 1919 MOVIES 1918 MOVIES 1917 MOVIES 1916 MOVIES 1915 MOVIES 1914 MOVIES 1913 MOVIES 1912 MOVIES 1911 MOVIES 1910 MOVIES ![]() |
Directed by The Pang Brothers A hitman who's in Bangkok to pull off a series of jobs falls for a local woman and bonds with his errand boy. REVIEW: The first thing you notice in Bangkok Dangerous is that the director/writer team, The Pang Brothers, sure know how to make a film. There's a lot of talent in this tale of a professional hitman settling into Bangkok, Thailand for a bit to do a few 'jobs'. In the last two years, I can't remember a live-action movie that's come of out Hollywood with such little dialogue too. In fact, over half of this film is silent as the visuals and brilliant sound design mainly tell us the story. They put in a voiceover as star Nicolas Cage narrates us through the rules of the hitman game, but that's not really needed and it seems a tad forced. The whole narration add on in Hollywood films has always been a head scratcher for me. Especially in a movie like this where we are obviously following the journey of the main character, feeling what he's feeling etc.. So why add an element that takes you out of the present time setting? Is it because they think the audience is stupid? All we have to do is go to the film WALL-E, which is basically a silent movie and audience weren't stupid enough to follow that film! Nic Cage again tries to play a tough guy with an edge, but this is just not his grammar. He's a goofy guy with a definite dark side and when those types of role come up, he is a master at playing them. In Bangkok Dangerous the director/writer's decided to use Cage's personality to their advantage while Cage attempts There are four rules of being a hitman and Bangkok Dangerous is a movie that tells us those rules right away so the lead character can break them throughout the film. The rules need to be broken because a human being can't really be human if they abide by them. A great hitman absolutely, but a person who has feelings and emotions, no. And this is the tale of Bangkok Dangerous. Man goes to a new place and forms feelings for the first time in ages. Why he all of a sudden forms feelings falls to a chance encounter. The art of a hitman we learn is always in the eyes. You can tell a lot about someone when you look at them in the eyes, especially how to kill someone. But when Joe the hitman looks into the eyes of a common person, he is smitten and this is when the movie really begins. He goes from one end of the spectrum to the other. This is really a character study film with a little action mixed in. The action scenes are well shot and original and are definitely the highlights of this film. So good in fact that I haven't been more impressed with a film in the Action genre than this film. I just wished there was more of it and less character study. I am a reviewer who mainly likes dramatic movies too, but Bangkok Dangerous just gets a little hooky when it tries to get us to emotionally feel for its characters. A bit of it is Cage's performance but it's also his new protege Kong, who is a character we get to observe a lot but never really know. Kong has the largest character arc in the film too, but it's muddled because we aren't convinced with his journey. There is also a love interest. A deaf woman Cage meets at the local pharmacy. This relationship is also interesting since neither character has any way to communicate with each other. A terrific concept that was never really explored at all and the way they handled it is by showing us montages. This is the key relationship in the movie that needed to be presented more and was really just the 3rd subplot. Overall, I loved and didn't love Bangkok Dangerous. An interesting made film that goes wrong in its essence.
Return from Bangkok Dangerous to home page |
|||||||||||||